learning-in-terms-of-points-and-lines
Problems and questions and answers can take a few dimensions: point, line, plane
Answering with a higher dimension always covers. Asking at a lower dimension doesn't work
What is a plane?
What formats cover what? (A formula may cover a point, a decision tree on methodology covers a line, diagram or illustration of the of physical covers a plane? Or, would that entail exposing the methodology?
Where a claim is a point, methodology or philosophy is a line, and an artifact to explore and push on and get feedback from is a field, when are each of these needed?
- Claim : a fact to center discussion
- methodology : a path to guide discussion
- artifacts : to build a shared understanding from individual experience
Given the hierarchy of claim, methodology, field, what is this hierarchy over? Information? Communication?
How does this compare to the abstraction hierarchy? Are these different? Why?
For planar fields vs. linear engagement, what mechanisms are available? Are fields only available through interpersonal interaction and experimentation?